The majority of edits on it have been made by people who don't actually use yuku.
Interesting. How do you know this? Did they identify themselves? Most Wikipedia contributors don't sign with their real names.
The majority of cases of where security appeared to be breached turned out to be a case of misunderstanding what the admin was seeing in the new access forums, or they broke their security by making changes that they didn't understand.
Our board must be in the minority, then. For example, soon after the move, two members posted in a forum that had been read-only. We hadn't made any changes there or given special privileges to those two members.
And ezop IS a board owner. The ezop does not get "demoted" to an admin, they remain the board owner. It's a name change, nothing more. The board owner, by default is the only person who can demote or promote admins. That power is disabled for other admins. The owner can give their admins that power however. The owner can give all admins powers equal to the owner. However the owner is still the owner. This is exactly the same as it was on ezboard, other than the fact that admin powers were not customisable on ezboard.
I need to clarify. At ezboard, our owner and our ezOp were different people. It had been that way for years. The ezOp could and did appoint and remove admins, without participation by the owner. He can't do it now. We're trying to get board ownership transferred to him so he can function more effectively.
views by the board owner should not use your ad-free page views, and thus do not affect the cost of running the board.
That's good to know. Recent communications have left us unsure on this point.